null


It's been a minute since I did a Battle of the Babes, but that doesn't mean that I haven't been doing my due diligence by combing the Skinternet for comBAREable actresses! Chloë Sevigny and Kirsten Dunst were both 90's "it" girls in their own ways, and have managed to maintain successful, if not wildly sporadic, careers well into the 2010's. Could it be because of their willingness to doff their duds and show off their buds? Can't hurt!

Of the two, the 41-year-old Chloë has taken the more artsy route throughout her career, and you KNOW those artsy types, they're always patrons of the parts! Sevigny DID beat around the bush when it came to her first nude appearance - in 1995's Kids - and continued to show off her umlauts in a slew of movies, most notably Boys Don't Cry (1999) and The Brown Bunny (2003) - a role in which she really sucked.

34-year-old Kirsten Dunst was Anne Hathawayed in the mid 2000's when she was literally everywhere and people just plain got sick of her, but by 2011 she was rack and better than ever in the 2011's Melancholia. Was she majorly miscast in the Mars von Trier movie? Look at those boobs! I personally adore Kirsten Dunst, and definitely fell in love with her in 1999's The Virgin Suicides and 2004's Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and while she's only given up great boob shots in 2010's All Good Things and Melancholia, her world class pair makes her nudity competitive against the ever-bare Sevigny! 

Take a peek and pick who wins this Battle of the Babes! 

Kirsten Dunst

null

null

null

null

null

Chloë Sevigny

null

null

null

null